November is National Adoption Month when families created through adoption celebrate their families and remember the first parents who were, for reasons good or bad, instrumental in the building of those families.
Which brings me to something I've mulled over for the past 10 or so years.
Are adoptive parents held to a higher standard than parents who gave birth to their children? Do adoptive parents feel the pressure to be perfect parents, or at least better parents than the child's birthparents could have been, even though there is no way to verify this idea? If a child has been abused by an adoptive parent, the media is quick to point out that they were adopted. They don't do that when the child was not adopted.
From the beginning of the adoption process, we are interviewed, have our backgrounds checked, our tax records checked, our bank accounts checked, we need references, we are required to go to parenting classes, classes on the psychology of the adopted child, child safety classes, etc. All things that are
not required of a parent who gives birth. Already, more is required of adoptive parents than biological parents to prove they are capable of parenting. I'm not saying we shouldn't have these requirements, we should. But right from the start it does create an anxiety in adoptive parents that we need to be perfect.
Children adopted internationally are significantly less likely to find their birthfamily. It happens occasionally, but not very often. And it is a significant loss to the child. Children adopted domestically have a higher chance of finding their birthparents and in open adoptions, it's practically guaranteed that the child will know his or her birthparents. And well they should, it is their history. I get annoyed with people who have no background in adoption who tell a child they should be grateful that they were adopted and not go looking for their biological parents. If it were them, they'd want to know!
So now, adoptive parents might take on the anxiety of knowing that their child who meets their birthparents will compare the family they grew up with to the family that could have been. Will their birthparents be given a report card about how well we did after 18 years of raising this child?
- What if their birthparents are extremely successful now and we are...not?
- What if the birthparents went on to have other children who are happy and well-adjusted? Could they have been good parents to the child they placed with another family?
- Did the biological parents ever get irritated with their other children or were they model parents?
My head tells me that chances are, if they did parent the child they placed, they would not be successful because statistically, it is extremely difficult under the best of circumstances. This applies more specifically to teen parents. And I have a great deal of research to back that up. Anyone who has been watching the Dr. Phil family with a young woman, now 21 who was pregnant at 15 and decided against adoption can see what the outcome has been. And she had a great deal of help from a nationally known psychologist and life coach (Dr. Phil) and her family. Unfortunately, her situation is the norm rather than the exception.
My father died when I was 8. My mother never remarried. I think there were two reasons for this:
- My mother didn't particularly like being married and they were planning a divorce when he got sick.
- My mother knew that she could remarry the nicest man in the world, but he could not compete with the perception young girls create about their perfect daddy who died. My father had his faults, which I can see now. As a pre-teen, however, he was my daddy and he was perfect.
Is this the same for adoptive parents? Are we competing with a perception of what the birthparents might have been? Are our internationally adopted children wondering if their birthparents are perfect parents and they are stuck with us? Are adoptive parents holding ourselves to a higher standard because of this? Are we allowing ourselves to be human and have faults or are we telling ourselves we must be perfect parents and prove ourselves worthy of parenting?
There are those who may say that we are already better parents because we didn't give them up for adoption. I don't agree. It takes a great deal of love to carry a baby to term when there are other legal options, and place that living child in the arms of someone else when you know you are not capable of being a parent at that time of your life.
So for all you adoptive parents out there, what is your take on this? I'm curious.